Body: | Click to View
Roman Catholic Faith Examined!
Is The Catholic Church an Infallible interpreter of the Bible?
Catholics say Yes! Truth says No!
Click to View
We Speak truth in LOVE
tell us if we have misrepresented Catholic Faith
Click to View
"The Roman Catholic Church itself is the God designated guardian of
Christianity on earth and alone has the divine authority to interpret
Scripture correctly." (Catholic belief)
Is The Catholic Church An Infallible Interpreter Of The Bible?
Catholics try to prove the infallibility of the Catholic Church by stating
that the Catholic Church is the infallible interpreter of the Bible. Their
claim makes the church equal, if not superior, to the Bible and is another
of their efforts to present the Catholic Church as an authority in religion
instead of the Bible only. Please notice the following from Catholic
sources:
"To make it in any sense an infallible revelation, or in other words
a revelation at all to us, we need a power to interpret the testament that
shall have equal authority with that testament itself." (The Question Box,
p. 95)
"An infallible Bible is no use without an infallible interpreter..."
(My Catholic Faith, p. 145).
"...The Scriptures can never serve as a complete Rule of Faith and a
complete guide to heaven independently of an authorized, living
interpreter." (The Faith of Our Fathers, p. 68).
"The Church is the only divinely constituted teacher of Revelation.
Now, the Scripture is the great depository of the Word of God. Therefore,
the Church is the divinely appointed Custodian and Interpreter of the
Bible. For, her office of infallible Guide were superfluous if each
individual could interpret the Bible for himself...God never intended the
Bible to be the Christians' rule of faith independently of the living
authority of the Church." (Ibid., p. 77).
There are no passages in the Bible which state that Christ made His church
the infallible interpreter of His Word. There are none that mention an
infallible interpreter and none that hint or remotely imply that Christ
wanted one. How, then, do the Catholic officials go about proving their
tremendous claims? First they try to do so by implying that the Bible
cannot be understood. Notice the following:
"For the Scripture is not like other books, dictated by the Holy
Ghost, it contains things of deepest importance, which in many instances
are very difficult and obscure. To understand and explain such things there
is always required the coming of the same Holy Ghost." (The Great
encyclical Letters of Leo XII, p. 227).
"We must, therefore, conclude that the Scriptures alone cannot be a
sufficient guide and rule of faith...because they are not of themselves
clear and intelligible even in matters of the highest importance..." (The
Faith of Our Fathers, p. 73).
"Is it possible to misunderstand the Bible? Yes, even the Bible
itself says so. 'In these epistles there are certain things difficult to
understand, which the unlearned and the unstable distort, just as they do
the rest of the Scriptures also, to their own destruction' (2nd Peter
3:16)." (A Catechism for Adults, p. 10).
Catholic officials follow up this claim by stating that one can get the
true meaning only from the Catholic Church. A Catechism for Adults on page
10 says, "How can you get the true meaning of the Bible? You can get it
only from God's official interpreter, the Catholic Church." As we said
before, the Catholics have no passages which mention an official
interpreter and, thus, they try to support their claim through human logic
and reasoning. Anytime men do such, it amounts to nothing more than human
philosophy rather than Scriptural proof. The Bible says, "Let God be true,
but every man a liar..." (Rom. 3:4). It also warns, "See to it that no one
deceives you by philosophy and vain deceit, according to human traditions,
according to the elements of the world and not according to Christ." (Col.
2:8). The inspired writers taught that we most certainly can understand the
Scriptures. "For we write nothing to you that you do not read and
understand." (2 Cor. 1:13). "...How that, according to revelation the
mystery has been made known to me, as I have written above in few words, as
you reading may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ." (Eph.
3:3-4; Douay-Rheims Version). "Therefore do not become foolish, but
understand what the will of the Lord is." (Eph. 5:17).
2 Pet. 3:15-16, alluded to above, does say that Paul wrote some things hard
to be understood and no one denies it; however, neither does that verse,
nor any other, tell us that we must go to the infallible interpreter for
the true meaning. Instead, we are commanded and exhorted: grow in knowledge
(2 Pet. 3:18), study (2 Tim. 2:15), exercise senses (Heb. 5:14), search
(Acts 17:11), receive (James 1:21), read (Eph. 3:3-4), desire it (2 Pet.
2:2), let it unfold (Psalm 119:130), meditate on it day and night (Psalm
1:2) hear it read (Rev. 1:3), have it preached (2 Tim. 4:2-4; 1 Pet. 4:11),
test what is said (1 John 4:1; Matt. 7:15-16), prove all things (1 Thess.
5:21). This is God's way--the only one He gives--for understanding the holy
Scriptures.
The next step by which Catholics try to support their claim that the
Catholic Church is the infallible interpreter of the Bible is the argument
of "interpretation." They say that an individual cannot make a private
interpretation of Scripture and is therefore dependent on the Catholic
Church for the correct interpretation. One can easily see the similarity
between this and their first argument. They often us 2 Pet. 1:20 in effort
to prove that one cannot have a private interpretation. Please notice the
following:
"How can you get the true meaning of the Bible? You can get it only
from God's official interpreter, the Catholic Church. 'This, then, you must
understand first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is made by private
interpretation' (2nd Peter 1:20)." (A Catechism for Adults, p. 10).
"No prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation. This
shows plainly that the scriptures are not to be expounded by any one's
private judgment or private spirit..." (From the footnote on 2 Pet. 1:20,
Douay- Rheims Version, p. 582).
"...St. Peter...declared against private interpretation of the
Scriptures (2 Pet. I, 20..." (Father Smith Instructs Jackson, p. 53).
We call your attention to the fact that they want you to make a private
interpretation of the above verse. What kind of rule is it that says we can
make a private interpretation of a verse which says we can't make a private
interpretation! Catholics are always inconsistent on this point. They quote
Scripture to support their doctrine expecting us to understand and to make
a private interpretation. However, when we quote a passage which refutes
their doctrine, they tell us that it is wrong to make private
interpretations!
In the following we quote 2 Pet. 1:20 and the verse which follows it from
two Catholic Versions. Please examine them carefully.
"This, then you must understand first of all, that no prophecy of
Scripture is made by private interpretation. For not by will of man was
prophecy brought at any time; but holy men of God spoke as they were moved
by the Holy Ghost." (Confraternity Version).
"First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of
Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, because no prophecy ever
came by the impulse of man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from
God." (Catholic Edition, Revised Standard Version).
Catholic writers usually only quote the first verse (vs. 20). However, when
viewing the two verses together, it is easy to see that Peter is not saying
one cannot have a private interpretation of Scripture, but is teaching that
no prophecy of Scripture ever came by private interpretation. W.E. Vine's
Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words says, "prophecy" signifies
"the speaking forth of the mind and counsel of God...in the N.T. it is
used...either of the exercise of the gift or of that which is
prophesied..." Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary says, "prophecy"
means "1: the vocation of a prophet; specif: the inspired declaration of
divine will and purpose 2: an inspired utterance of a prophet." Thus, Peter
is saying that no prophecy of Scripture (divine utterance of a prophet in
writing) is a matter of one's own interpretation (i.e., not a matter of the
prophet's own interpretation) because no prophecy ever came by the impulse
of man, but it came as the prophets were moved by the Holy Spirit. The
passage affirms the inspiration of the Scriptures. They did not originate
from private interpretations or private wills of men, but from holy men of
God who were moved by the Holy Spirit.
Catholic officials sometimes refer to the case of the Ethiopian nobleman in
which Philip asked if he understood what he was reading, and the reply,
"Why, how can I, unless someone shows me?" and argue that every one must
depend on an official interpreter. (See The Faith of Our Fathers, p. 70;
The Faith of Millions, p. 153). However, the Eunuch only had the prophecy
of Isaiah in his hands which words could not be understood without a
knowledge of what had happened at Calvary. (See Acts 8:29-35). Of course,
in this formative period when the gospel message had not been fully
revealed and the story of the cross had not been told, one would have to be
guided to the fulfillment of this dark prophecy to know who it was that
"was led like a sheep to slaughter; and just as a lamb dumb before its
shearer, so did he not open his mouth." However, now that we have the
inspired record of the exact literal fulfillment of the prophecy, we do not
need an interpreter to tell us what it means.
Actually, there is no difference between the "private interpretation"
argument and the one on understanding. To say that one cannot have a
private interpretation of the Scripture is the same as saying that one
cannot have his own understanding of the Scriptures. The word
"interpretation" means "1: to explain the meaning of 2: to conceive in the
light of individual belief, judgment, or circumstance." (Webster's Seventh
New Collegiate Dictionary). The inspired writers taught that men can
privately interpret or understand the Scriptures. "How that, according to
revelation the mystery has been make known to me, as I have written above
in few words, as you reading may understand my knowledge in the mystery of
Christ." (Eph. 3:3-4 Douay-Rheims Version). "For we write nothing to you
that you do not read and understand." (2 Cor. 1:13). In spite of this,
Catholic officials constantly ridicule the thought of private
interpretations. Notice the following:
"Its roots must be traced back to the principle of subjectivism
which Luther introduced into religion by making the private judgment of the
individual autonomous and supreme. According to this principle, the
subjective reaction of the individual, with its large core of feeling and
emotion, constitutes the sole criterion of religious truth and error." (The
Faith of Millions, pp. 35-36).
"Either my dear friend, you are infallibly certain that your
particular interpretation of the Bible is the correct one or you are not.
If you maintain that you are infallibly certain, then you claim for
yourself--and you cannot very well deny the same for every other reader of
the Bible--a personal infallibility which you deny only to the pope and
which we claim only for him.
"If you do not claim to be infallibly certain that your
interpretation of the whole Bible is correct, then of what value is it to
have an infallible Bible without an infallible interpreter? In either case
your statement crumbles. The plain fact is that an infallible Bible without
and infallible living interpreter is futile. Infallibility never gets from
the printed pages to the one place it is needed: the mind of the reader."
(Ibid., p. 138).
The reasoning of the above Catholic writer is worse than ridiculous. He
argues that when one makes a private interpretation of the Scriptures, he
claims for himself a personal infallibility. When an individual reads and
interprets the Bible, it no more makes him infallible than does reading of
Abraham Lincoln makes him Abraham Lincoln! The individual with his feelings
and emotions does not constitute an infallible authority; the Word itself
is the infallible authority. Infallibility gets from the printed page to
the mind of the reader simply by the reader comprehending what he reads.
Catholics raise tremendous opposition to private interpretation of the
Bible; however, a study of the holy Scriptures plainly reveals that God
requires and expects man to make private interpretations of His Word. The
powers and blessings of the Word of God comes only to those who privately
interpret the Word. For example: "refreshing the soul" (Psalm 19:8),
"giving understanding to the simple" (Psalm 119:130), "which is able to
build you up" (Acts 20:32 Catholic Edition RSV), "a discerner of the
thoughts and intentions of the heart" (Heb. 4:12), "I write to you in order
that you may not sin" (1 John 2:1), "that the man of God may be perfect,
equipped for every good work" (2 Tim. 3:16-17). These things are not
received and are not accomplished unless one makes a private interpretation
of the Word, thus, showing that a private interpretation is required. Man
must exercise his senses upon the Word of God that he might be able to
discern between good and evil (Heb. 5:14).
Jesus expected the people of His day to privately interpret the Scriptures.
He used such terms as "search the Scriptures" (John 5:39), "have you not
read?" (Matt. 12:3; 12:5; 19:4; 21:16,42; 22:31), "is it not written in
your law?" (John 10:34; Luke 10:26) which show that the people were
obligated to read and interpret the Scriptures. Furthermore, He quoted the
Scriptures as the final source of authority (Matt. 22:29-32; Mark 7:9-13)
and He always showed the consequences of failing to do so, e.g., "You err,
not knowing the Scriptures..." (Matt. 22:29 Douay-Rheims Version), "...Thus
making void the word of God through your tradition" (Mark 7:13 Catholic
Edition RSV). These things show that Jesus wanted and required a private
interpretation of Scriptures.
The common people readily heard and understood Christ's teaching without an
infallible interpreter. Mark 12:37 says, "And the mass of the common people
like to hear him." Jesus said, "I praise thee, Father, Lord of heaven and
earth, that thou didst hide these things from the wise and prudent, and
didst reveal them to little ones." (Matt. 11:25). In Matt. 13:51, Jesus
said to His disciples, "Have ye understood all these things? They said to
him, 'Yes'." If the common people could interpret Jesus's Word, and much of
the New Testament is simply the Word which Jesus spoke to the people, so
can we. Isaiah, prophesying of the New Testament Way, said, "A path and a
way shall be there...and this shall be unto you a straight way, so that
fools shall not err therein." (Isa. 35:8). God has endowed us with reason
and the power to choose between good and evil, right and wrong, truth and
error. These are all set before us and the responsibility rests upon us to
function as intelligent free agents. God will judge every man in accord
with his response to His holy Word. Jesus said, "He that despiseth me, and
receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him; the word that I have
spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day." (John 12:48 Douay-Rheims
Version). All these things show that a private interpretation is possible
and necessary.
After the church was established, the apostles and prophets likewise
required that people make a private interpretation of Scripture (Acts 9:22;
18:28) and the people did that very thing (Acts 17:11; 2 Tim. 3:15). When
churches began to be established as result of the preaching of God's Word
and when the New Testament Scriptures began to be written, never in one
instance did the apostles and prophets declare that private interpretation
must now cease because the church was not the official interpreter of the
Scriptures. They did not direct the people to an infallible interpreter of
the Word, but to the Word itself. Please note carefully the following:
What the Bible says
What the Bible does NOT say
"These things I am writing to you that you may know that you have eternal life..." (1 John 5:13).
"These things I am writing to you that when you obtain the infallible interpretations thereof you may know that you have eternal life..."
"...The things I am writing to you are the Lord's commandments." (1 Cor. 14:37).
"...The things I am writing to you when officially interpreted are the Lord's commandments."
"...As you reading, my understand may knowledge in the mystery of Christ..." (Eph. 3:4 Douay-Rheims Version)
"...As you reading, and have officially interpreted, may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ."
"...The Sacred Writings, which are able to instruct thee unto salvation by the faith which is in Christ Jesus." (2 Tim. 3:15)
"...The Sacred Writings, which when infallibly interpreted are able to instruct thee unto salvation by the faith which is in Christ Jesus."
"...With meekness receive the ingrafted word which is able to save your souls." (James 1:21)
"...With meekness receive the infallible interpretations of the ingrafted word which is able to save your soul."
"And the dead were judged by what was written in the books..." (Rev. 20:12 Catholic Edition RSV)
"And the dead were judged by what was written in the books in accord with the infallible interpretations thereof."
The passages which require us to test teachers (1 John 4:1; Matt. 7:15-16;
Acts 17:11) and to withdraw from those in error (2 John 9-11; Rom. 16:17; 2
Thess. 3:6) require a private interpretation. How can we obey these
commands without making a private judgment in regard to what is and is not
in accord with Scripture? The passages which require study show that we
must make a private interpretation (2 Tim. 2:15; 2 Pet. 3:18; Heb.
5:11-14). How can one study the Scriptures without making a private
interpretation of Scripture? Actually, every passages in the Bible that is
addressed to the individual shows that God wants and expects a private
interpretation. God, through His Word, addresses each individual as an
intelligent being. Each person is responsible for himself; another cannot
decide or act for him. "...Work out your own salvation with fear and
trembling." (Phil. 2:12 Catholic Edition RSV). "Therefore every one of us
will render an account of himself to God." (Rom. 14:12).
The blessings of God are for those who obey His Word (James 1:25; Rev.
1:3). The curses are on those who do not obey (1 Pet. 4:17-18; 2 Thess.
1:6-9). At the judgment each individual will be judged by the things
written in the Bible. "...And the dead were judged by the things which were
written in the books..." (Rev. 20:12 Douay-Rheims Version; also see John
12:48; Rom. 2:16; James 2:12). The fact that God will judge each individual
by the written Word shows that each individual is required to interpret the
Word. Also, it shows that man is responsible to no other authority in
religion.
The doctrine of an "infallible interpreter" is completely false and wholly
unworthy of acceptance for the following reasons. First, it implies that
the common people are too ignorant to understand. The religious leaders of
Jesus's day thought the same when they said, "Has any one of the rulers
believed in him, or any of the Pharisees? But this crowd, which does not
know the Law, is accursed." (John 7:48-49). They thought the people were
too ignorant of the Law to be able to decide if Jesus was the Christ.
Nevertheless, the common people accepted Jesus but the rulers rejected Him.
Secondly, the doctrine of an "infallible interpreter" implies that
religious leaders should make decisions for the people. It does not allow
one to make his own interpretation of Scripture, but demands a dependence
on Catholic officials for interpretation. Please notice the following:
"What Catholics do believe is that the church, not the individual,
must interpret and explain Christ's teaching, including those set forth in
the Bible. Christians outside the Catholic fold do not of course accept
this authority, but for Catholics it eliminates the doubts, confusion and
misunderstanding which inevitably results from individual interpretations.
"The intolerance of the Church toward error, the natural position of one
who is the custodian of truth, her only reasonable attitude makes her
forbid her children to read or to listen to heretical controversy, or to
endeavor to discover religious truths by examining both sides of the
question." (Explanation of Catholic Morals, p. 35)
"In matters of faith and morals pertaining to the building up of
Christian doctrine, that is to be held as the true sense of the Sacred
Scriptures which the Holy Mother Church as held and does hold, to whom it
belongs to judge of the true sense and interpretation of Holy Scriptures,
and therefore that it is permitted to no one to interpret the said
Scriptures against this sense or, likewise, against the unanimous consent
of the Fathers." (The Vatican Council, confirming the decree of the Council
of Trent--Fourth Session, April, 1546).
The "unanimous consent of the Fathers" is as much a non-entity as Paul
Bunyan and Babe, the immense Blue Ox! Even if one could find something on
which the early church fathers unanimously agreed, it still remains that
they were purely uninspired writers with no authority whatsoever. We will
not be judged by their writings in the last day. If there was any consent
at all among them, it was in declaring the necessity and importance of the
Scriptures as the only authority in faith and morals.
The above Catholic writers reveal that no Catholic can enjoy the right of
private or individual interpretation because only the church can give the
true and authentic interpretation of Scripture. Thus, like the wicked
priests and false prophets of the Old Testament era, the Catholic Church
has taken the Word of God from the people. It does not want its people to
have the Word of God for it claims sole interpretation for itself and puts
footnotes in its Versions to explain away the meaning of passages which
contradict its doctrine. Consequently, the Catholic people being forbidden
to be guided directly by the Word of God, are left with a human and
fallible guide, the church. They must follow men rather than God; they must
bow their heads to the commandments of men rather than God's holy precepts.
The Bible teaches that each individual is responsible for himself and is
not to blindly follow religious leaders. Jesus said, "Beware of false
prophets who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous
wolves." (Matt. 7:15). Paul said, "And no wonder, for Satan himself
disguises himself as an angel of light. It is no great thing, then, if his
ministers disguise themselves as ministers of justice. But their end will
be according to their works." (2 Cor. 11:14-15). The Bible nowhere implies
that one is dependent on religious leaders for interpretation; instead, it
commands the individual Christian to test every teacher by the written Word
(1 John 4:1; Acts 17:11; 1 Thess. 5:21).
In the following, a Catholic authority affirms that we should do as the
Jews of the Old Testament and follow the priests.:
"But in those times the faithful did not attempt to interpret
scripture for themselves. For the Jewish people in the pre-Christian era,
the synagogue was their voice of scriptural authority; and the Old
Testament was preached to them by the Rabbis and fathers of their faith. In
like manner, the Catholic Church was the custodian of the inspired writings
of the New Testament Gospel nearly four centuries before these writings
were collected into a single book and formally declared to be inspired.
"Today Catholics listen to one authoritative voice--the Church--in
the interpretation of God's word." (Knights of Columbus, Ad., "The Bible Is
A Confusing Book").
The Jews of old were to listen to God's Word, not to man's interpretations.
When they became dependent on their leaders for interpretations, it proved
disastrous to them. Notice the following from the Word of God.
"But these also have been ignorant through wine, and through
drunkenness have erred: the priest and the prophet have been ignorant
through drunkenness, they are swallowed up with wine, they have gone astray
in drunkenness, they have not known him that seeth, they have been ignorant
of judgment." (Isa. 28:7).
"The prophets prophesied falsehood, and the priest clapped their
hands: and my people loved such things: what then shall be done in the end
thereof?" (Jer. 5:31).
"Therefore will I give their women to strangers, their fields to
others for an inheritance: because from the least even to the greatest all
follow covetousness: from the prophet even to the priest all deal
deceitfully." (Jer. 8:10).
"For the prophet and the priest are defiled: and in my house I have
found their wickedness, saith the Lord." (Jer. 23:11).
"Her priests have despised my law, and have defiled my sanctuaries:
they have put no difference between holy and profane: nor have
distinguished between the polluted and the clean: and they have turned away
their eyes from my Sabbaths, and I was profaned in the midst of them."
(Ezek. 22:26).
"And like the jaws of highway robbers, they conspire with the
priests who murder in the way those that pass out of Sichem: for they have
wrought wickedness." (Osee 6:9).
"Her prophets are senseless men without faith: her priests have
polluted the sanctuary, they have acted unjustly against law." (Soph. 3:4).
The above passages (there are numerous others) reveal the fatal result of
depending on priest and religious leaders for interpretation. Isaiah said,
"For these who lead this people lead them astray, and those who are led by
them are swallowed up." (Isa. 9:16; Catholic Edition RSV). It was the
priests and religious leaders who led in the crucifying of the Son of God.
In spite of this abundant evidence of the wickedness of the priests and
prophets of the Old Testament, Catholic officials today argue that people
must depend on them for interpretation as did the Jews on their leaders.
Peter warned, "But there were false prophets also among the people, just as
among you will be lying teachers who will bring in destructive sects." (2
Pet. 2:1).
Thirdly, the doctrine of the "infallible interpreter" implies that God did
not make Himself clear. It implies that God gave us a revelation that still
needs revealing. Did God fail in His attempt to give man a revelation? Do
the Catholic officials want us to believe they can express God's will more
clearly than God Himself? We believe that God made the mind of man and is
fully capable of addressing man in words which man can understand.
The Catholic Church is far more confusing than the Bible because it is a
very complicated and ever changing organization. Think of how many human
laws nearly 300 so-called popes could make through the centuries. The
following quotation states that only two of them issued nearly nine
thousand. "Alexander III is said to have issued thirty-nine hundred and
thirty-nine decrees and Innocent II over five thousand." (General
Legislation in the New Code of Canon Law, p. 42). Another example of how
burdensome and perplexing this maze of human doctrine has become, just the
"Bulls" of the popes from 540 to 1857 fills forty-one volumes. This does
not include the countless laws formulated by synods and councils. It is no
wonder that a cry of despair went up from the Catholic bishops for relief
from this babel of confusion.
"Moreover, not a few ordinances, whether included in the Corpus
Juris or of more recent date, appear to be contradictory; some have been
repealed, others had become obsolete by long disuse; others, again, had
ceased to be useful or applicable in the present condition of society.
Great confusion was thus engendered and correct knowledge of the law was
rendered very difficult even for those who had to enforce it." (General
Legislation in the New Code of Canon Law, p. 70).
It is very evident and has long been recognized by all and
proclaimed everywhere that some revision and reformation of Canon Law is
necessary and very urgent. For, owing to the changes that have taken place
in society, many laws have become useless and others very difficult if not
impossible to observe; of others it is doubtful whether they are still in
vigor or not. Finally in the course of centuries, their number is so
multiplied and they have been heaped up in voluminous collections that, in
a sense, we may say, we are buried beneath the laws. Hence it is that the
study of Canon Law is beset with almost inextricable difficulties, the door
is open to disputes and litigations, consciences are troubled with a
thousand anxieties, and people are driven to despise the law." (Ibid, p.
71; see also Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 645 and Vol. IX, p. 64).
Truly, the Bible gives a much simpler and easier explanation of God's will
than the works written and published by the authority of the Catholic
Church. I have read many Catholic books and it is much easier to understand
the simple words of the Bible than to understand the complicated words of
the Catholic vocabulary. For example, in 1 Cor. 11:20, the Bible speaks of
"the Lord's supper." This simple term is taken away from the people by the
clergy and for it they are given the word, "Eucharist," and if that is not
confusing enough, try the word, "transubstantiation." The reason the Bible
is easier to understand is because it is from God. It is indeed
understandable and is the only safe guide which can instruct us to heaven
(2 Tim. 3:15-17). It is concise, complete, and will remain the same until
the end of time (1 Pet. 1:23-25).
Fourthly, the doctrine of an "infallible interpreter" is impractical and
unfeasible. A few pertinent questions reveal the absurd and ridiculous
nature of the doctrine. For example, if a sincere, honest person found a
passage which he could not understand, to whom must he go for an infallible
interpretation? Could a priest give the infallible interpretation of the
passage? The priest could not because he is not infallible. Could a bishop,
archbishop, or cardinal give it? They likewise cannot give infallible
interpretations. The only person who can give an infallible interpretation
is the pope and he can do it only when he is speaking ex-cathedra.
Notice the following quotation from Catholic sources:
"The Church teaches infallibly when it states, through the Pope
alone, that he speaks officially (ex-cathedra) as the Supreme head, for the
entire universal church.
"In order to speak infallibly, the Pope must speak ex-cathedra, or
officially, under the following conditions:
"1. He must pronounce himself on a subject of faith or morals.
"2. He must speak as the Vicar of Christ, in his office as Pope, and
to the whole Church, to all the faithful throughout the world. In his
capacity as private teacher, he is as any other teacher of the Church.
"3. He must make clear by certain words his intention to speak
ex-cathedra, that is, to make use of his supreme authority." (My Catholic
Faith, p. 147).
Therefore, in spite of all the tremendous claims about the Catholic Church
being infallible, we learn from Catholic doctrine that the church is
infallible only in the person of the pope and he is infallible only when he
speaks ex-cathedra! In other words, all their boastful arguments of the
Catholic Church being infallible only mean that the pope is infallible
because according to them the church is infallible only in and through him.
This makes all their exaggerated claims very narrow and limited to say the
least.
The Catholic officials themselves have made up all of the above
"ex-cathedra" conditions. There are no such conditions in the Bible; none
like them were placed on the apostles and prophets. They did not follow the
ex-cathedra procedure. The conditions which Catholic leaders have devised
are a convenient means to evade the mistakes of the popes. For instance, a
man named Galileo, an astronomer of the 17th century, taught that the earth
was round and moves around the sun and rotates making night and day. He was
tried by the Inquisition with pope Paul V as chairman and was condemned as
a heretic for teaching, as they said, "Contrary to the sacred and divine
Scriptures." The pope and the others with him condemned Galileo because
they believed the opposite at that time--that the earth was flat and stands
still and the sun moves around it making night and day. The following
Catholic sources freely admit this mistake.
"...There is no doubt that he fully approved the decision, having
presided at the session of the Inquisition wherein the matter was discussed
and decided. In thus acting, it is undeniable that the ecclesiastical
authorities committed a grave and deplorable error, and sanctioned an
altogether false principle as to the proper use of the Scripture."
(Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, p. 544).
"So Tanquary in his 'Synopsis Theologica,' published in New York,
writes, 'We readily grant that these congregations (Index and Inquisition)
were wrong in condemning Galileo...and that the two popes (Paul and Urban
VII) erred, not only as private persons, but as the heads of these
congregations, whose decree are valueless unless approved by the pope'."
(The Question Box, p. 318, 1913 Edition).
The above is a clear example of the worth of their so-called "infallible
interpretations." Catholic officials conveniently dodge such mistakes of
the popes by saying that they weren't speaking ex-cathedra. Nevertheless,
when the apostles and prophets stated that something was or was not in
accord with Scripture (e.g., concerning application of the Old Testament
Scripture), they made no mistakes.
Referring again to our main thought, it is impossible for a sincere, honest
person to receive an infallible interpretation. We ask, "Has it been
practical for men in every age and country to travel to Rome for infallible
interpretations?" Moreover, "If one went to Rome, could he expect to meet
with the pope and have the pope give an ex-cathedra interpretation just for
him?" Such has never occurred in the past. The average Catholic would be
surprised to know that in spite of all the emphasis their officials put on
"official interpretations," there has been very few infallible
interpretations given in the nearly two thousand years since Christ, and
besides, the average Catholic does not know what those interpretations are.
If one should ask the average Catholic, "What are the infallible
interpretations which have been given by the Catholic Church," he would
probably answer, "What do you mean by infallible interpretations?" We say,
therefore, that the doctrine of an infallible interpreter is impractical
and is nothing more than a man-made argument to boast the church as an
authority in opposition to the Bible only.
We raise other vital questions, "If we cannot understand the inspired
writings of Peter, the supposed first pope, how do we know we can
understand the infallible interpretations of the present pope? Catholic
officials argue, "In order that he (the pope, DJR) should be
infallible...it is necessary that his teaching should not be given by word
of mouth, but in writing, in a regular document; for if he merely spoke,
some uncertainly would exist as to what he actually said." (Plain Facts for
Fair Minds, pp. 38-39). They should be able to see that in order to prevent
uncertainty concerning His will, God has already given infallible writings.
Furthermore, we ask, "Who gives the infallible interpretations of the
infallible interpreter?" In other words, "Will they place another to give
infallible interpretations of the pope's interpretations if some do not
understand? The point is, man needs a starting point somewhere. He needs an
infallible standard which stands as the one supreme authority. God has
given that standard--His sacred writings--and He has made it readily
available for all who want it. Nowhere did God tell us to go to an
infallible interpreter to get the true meaning of His holy Word. God did
not give us an infallible interpreter of the Word, but gave us the Word
itself, and He wants and expects all to properly interpret it. This does
not mean that man will always correctly interpret it. Man often fails and
does not measure up to what God requires of him. When man fails in his
effort to interpret the Word, it does not mean that the Word is useless
without an infallible interpreter. When he fails, the fault lies with him
and not with the Word itself.
Man often allows certain hindrances which causes him to mis-interpret the
Bible, e.g., ignorance (Matt. 22:29), lack of study (2 Tim. 2:15), no
desire for knowledge (2 Pet. 3:17-18), following leaders without
investigation (2 Pet. 2:1-3; Rom. 16:17-18), being prejudiced and closed
minded (Matt. 13;15), twisting and corrupting the Word (2 Pet. 3:16; 2 Cor.
2:17), having no love for truth (2 Thess. 2:10-11). If a man carefully and
faithfully follows the commands of God, he will properly interpret God's
written Word, e.g., study (2 Tim. 2:15), exercise senses (Heb. 5:14),
search (Acts 17:11), receive (James 1:21), read (Eph. 3:3-4), desire it (1
Pet. 2:2), grow in knowledge (2 Pet. 3:18), strive to understand (Eph.
5:17), let it unfold (Psalm (Psalm 119:130), meditate on it day and night
(Psalm 1:2), hear it read (Rev. 1:3), have it preached (2 Tim. 4:2-4; 1
Pet. 4:11), test what is said (1 John 4:1; Matt. 7:15-16), prove all things
(1 Thess. 5:21). If an individual continually obeyed all these commands,
would he understand God's Word? Compliance to these commands is the only
way the sincere, honest person can obtain the correct interpretation of a
passage. This is the correct way because it is God's way.
The following Catholic officials argue that private interpretation of the
Scriptures causes division.
"Must it not be evident to the thoughtful reader of these lines,
whether he be Protestant or Catholic, that the estrangement of such a vast
number of our countrymen is traceable in large measure to the division,
dissension and anarchy which the principle of making each individual
supreme and a Court of Last Appeal in the interpretation of Scripture has
brought into the world? (The Faith of Millions, p. 156).
"Others believe in placing the Bible in every home and permit all
readers to interpret it in their own way. This unreasonable theory is still
advocated even though it has split up Christianity into a thousand
divisions. (Father Smith Instructs Jackson, p. 52).
"The reformation produced indeed an exaggerated individualism, which
by declaring every man equally competent to find out the doctrine of the
Saviour from his own private reading of the Scriptures, has led millions to
the utter denial of Christ." (The Question Box, p. 131; there is a similar
statement from Archbishop Spalding in his book entitled, "Miscellanea," p.
393).
It is not the private interpretation of the Scriptures, but Catholicism's
continuous flood of false arguments to displace the Bible as the sole
authority that causes division, e.g., the Catholic Church has the right to
make laws (Explanation of Catholic Morals, p. 26), Jesus promised to
protect His church from error (A Catechism for Adults, p. 56), if she had
not carefully selected and gathered the books, there would be no New
Testament (The Faith of Millions, p. 145), it is wrong to make a private
interpretation of Scripture (Father Smith Instruct Jackson, p. 53), an
infallible Bible without an infallible interpreter is futile (The Faith of
Millions, p. 138), the church is the sole interpreter of the Bible (Council
of Trent, Fourth Session), we should follow the priests as did the Jews of
the Old Testament (Knights of Columbus, Ad.). The general public
(especially Protestantism) has been bombarded with a constant array of
these Catholic arguments all of which are designed to exalt the Catholic
Church and to raise questions and doubts about the Bible as the only
authority. Such arguments have weakened men's faith in the Bible as the
only authority so much so that very few so-called Protestants accept the
Bible as the only rule of faith today. Very few Catholics have any love and
respect for the Bible for they have been taught that it cannot be the final
and absolute authority.
The Catholic Church is the major cause of division in Christianity, not
private interpretation of Scripture. The Catholic Church is truly the
mother of division because every major division in Christianity originated
and came out of the Catholic Church. Most of the human traditions in
Protestantism today originated in Catholicism, e.g,, infant baptism,
instrumental music in worship, observance of Christmas and Easter, etc.
Nearly all denominations have been influenced by the Catholic Church which
is the great apostasy, the mother of division. The only way to obtain true
unity is by complete abandonment of the traditions and doctrines of men and
going back to the Bible. Men must begin studying the Scriptures for
themselves and begin demanding a "thus saith the Lord" in all matters of
faith and practice. Paul said, "Carefully study to present thyself approved
unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly handling the
word of truth." (2 Tim. 2:15 Douay-Rheims Version). Unity based on God's
holy Word is the only kind of unity that is pleasing to God.
The doctrine that the Catholic Church is the infallible interpreter of the
Bible is completely false because (1) It implies that the common people are
too ignorant to understand. (2) It demands that religious leaders make
decisions for the people. (3) It indicates that God cannot make Himself
clear. (4) It is impractical and unfeasible. (5) The Scriptures nowhere
indicate that God gave us an infallible interpreter of His Word, but
plainly reveal that He simply gave us His infallible Word. (6) The Bible
teaches that private interpretation of Scripture is possible and necessary.
We conclude this study by emphasizing that Jesus and His apostles placed no
authority whatsoever in the church, but instead exalted the holy Scriptures
as man's infallible guide. Jesus said, "Search the scriptures, for you
think in them to have life everlasting; and the same are they that give
testimony of me." (John 5:39 Douay-Rheims Version). He often said, "Is it
not written in your law," expecting the people to have read and understood.
In His story of the rich man and Lazarus the sufficiency of the Scriptures
is again stressed in the words, "They have Moses and the Prophets, let them
hearken to them." The rich man insisted that Abraham should send someone
from the dead in order to convince his brothers on earth, but Abraham
answered, "If they do not harken to Moses and the Prophets, they will not
believe even if someone rises from the dead." (Luke 16:29-31).
We beseech our Catholic friends and relatives, who insist on the living
voice of the church as their rule of faith, to carefully examine these and
others passages for they place the authority not in the priesthood or
church, but in the written Word of God. The Scriptures were given by the
inspiration of God and furnish the man of God completely to every good
work. (2 Tim. 3:16-17). They are complete, sufficient, and provide all
things necessary to produce the faith which brings life in the name of
Jesus. (John 20:31). Jesus said, "I have given them thy word...Sanctify
them in the truth. Thy word is truth." (John 17:14,17). Therefore, only in
the holy Bible can we find truth and eternal life. There is no other
authority; none can be substituted or added to it. Again, we beseech and
invite our Catholic friends to receive the Word of God and it alone as
their infallible standard and guide in religion. May God be with you in
your endeavors to serve Him.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A Catechism For Adults, William J. Conan, ACTA Publications, Chicago,
Illinois, 1959.
Catholic Encyclopedia, Knights of Columbus, (Fifteen Volumes), The
Encyclopedia Press, Inc., New York, 1913.
Canons and Decrees of he Council of Trent, H.J. Schroeder, B. Herder Book
company, St. Louis, London, 1950.
Father Smith Instructs Jackson, John Francis Noll & Lester J. Fallon,
Knights of Columbus Religious Information Bureau, 1960.
General Legislation in the New Code of Cannon Law, H.A. Ayrinhac, Longmans,
Green & Co., New York, 1969
Miscellanea, M.J. Spalding, Webb, Gill and Levering, Louisville, Ky., 1855.
My Catholic Faith, Louis Lapavoire Morrow, My Mission House, Kenosha,
Wisconsin, 1949
Plain Facts for Fair Minds, George M. Searle, Paulist Press, New York,
1915.
Question Box, Bertrand L. Conway, The Columbus Press, New York, N.Y., 1913.
Question Box, New Revised Edition, Bertrand L. Conway, The Paulist Press,
New York, N.Y., 1929.
The Bible Is A Confusing Book, Knights of Columbus Religious Information
Bureau, St. Louis, 1948.
The Faith of Millions, John A. O'Brien, Our Sunday Visitor, Huntington,
Ind., 1938.
The Faith of Our Fathers, James Cardinal Gibbons, John Murphy Co.,
Baltimore, Md., 1917.
The Great Encyclical Letters of Leo XIII, John J. Waynne, S.J. Benaiger
Bros., New York, 1903.
CATHOLIC TRANSLATIONS
Confraternity-Douay Version, Timothy Press, Chicago, 1959
Douay-Rheims Version, Catholic Book Publishing Co., New York, 1945.
Catholic Edition-Revised Standard Version, Published by Thomas Nelson &
Sons Ltd for the Incorporated Catholic Truth Society, London, 1966.
By David J. Riggs
Rome The Only Infallible Interpreter of Scripture:
"10. ... God Himself has set up a living authority to establish and teach
the true and legitimate meaning of His heavenly revelation. This authority
judges infallibly all disputes which concern matters of faith and morals,
lest the faithful be swirled around by every wind of doctrine which springs
from the evilness of men in encompassing error. And this living infallible
authority is active only in that Church which was built by Christ the Lord
upon Peter, the head of the entire Church, leader and shepherd, whose faith
He promised would never fail. This Church has had an unbroken line of
succession from Peter himself; these legitimate pontiffs are the heirs and
defenders of the same teaching, rank, office and power. And the Church is
where Peter is,[5] and Peter speaks in the Roman Pontiff,[6] living at all
times in his successors and making judgment,[7] providing the truth of the
faith to those who seek it.[8] The divine words therefore mean what this
Roman See of the most blessed Peter holds and has held." (Qui Pluribus, (On
Faith And Religion), Encyclical of Pope Pius IX, November 9, 1846.)
Catholic Doctrine (Not Scripture) Is The Supreme Law:
14. ... Catholic doctrine, as authoritatively proposed by the Church,
should be held as the supreme law; for, seeing that the same God is the
author both of the Sacred Books and of the doctrine committed to the
Church, it is clearly impossible that any teaching can by legitimate means
be extracted from the former, which shall in any respect be at variance
with the latter. Hence it follows that all interpretation is foolish and
false which either makes the sacred writers disagree one with another, or
is opposed to the doctrine of the Church. (Providentissimus Deus, (On the
Study of Holy Scripture), Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII dated November 18th,
1893.)
"85 "The task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God,
whether in its written form [Scripture] or in the form of Tradition, has
been entrusted to the living, teaching office of the Church alone. Its
authority in this matter is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ."47 This
means that the task of interpretation has been entrusted to the bishops in
communion with the successor of Peter, the Bishop of Rome. (Catechism of
the Catholic Church, 1994, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, page 27.)
Click to View
Go To Start: WWW.BIBLE.CA
|