Body: | 4 Competing Views of Church Organization
The Historical Development of the Papal and Patriarchal Systems of
Centralized Church Government
Click to View Learn from the Bible Blueprint, how the church was organized
by the apostles!
Click to View Find a local congregation of the New Testament church that is
organized exactly as the Bible says
Click to View
John Paul II
Catholic, Bishop of Rome, Pope
Click to View Introduction
Click to View Graphical Mouse Rollover of gradual change of organization over time
Click to View Outline: 33-150 AD
Click to View Outline: 150-250 AD
Click to View Outline: 250-451 AD
Click to View Outline: 451-588 AD
Click to View Outline: 588-606 AD
Click to View Outline: 606 AD-Today
Click to View Catholic organization today
Click to View Orthodox organization today
Click to View True Bible organization today
Click to View Find a local congregation of the New Testament church in your own home town.
Click to View
Bartholomew
Orthodox, Archbishop of Constantinople, New Rome and Ecumenical Patriarch
Today: 4 Competing views of organization:
There are four different ways that believers in Christ view the development
of papal power in Rome:
The true position: True Christians follow the organization of
exactly what God already revealed in the Bible. If God wanted a Patriarchal
system, it would be revealed in the Bible and Set up on the Day of
Pentecost. If God wanted Rome to be the all time world headquarters of the
church, the first century Christians knew nothing about it and God failed
to mention such in the Bible. True Christians do Bible things in Bible
ways, call Bible things by Bible names and view the Bible as a complete
inspired blueprint revealed once for all time. True Christians view the
Bible as the only roadmap and reject all creeds and councils as of human
origin. The foundational error of Roman Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants
is their acceptance of the Nicene council as authoritative. As soon as you
accept the Nicene council, you leave the barn door open for wild apostasy.
All human creeds are to be rejected, even if they are correct, because they
compete with the authority of the Bible. If you think this is not true,
take note that both the Catholic and Orthodox churches reject "Sola
Scriptura" and openly admit that the Bible is not enough and that we
actually need human creeds. How sad and how blasphemous! In the Bible,
there was no organization larger than the local church. Individual local
churches, functioned independent and autonomous of each other, with no ties
between them, is the pattern we see. Within each local church, the pattern
is that of a plurality of men who meet the qualifications of 1 Tim 3 and
Tit 1, with total control over the congregation. Under them are deacons,
who serve as servants of the elders to assist, as instructed, to govern the
local church. Pulpit preachers have no more authority than common members,
unless they are also one of the elders. Let us get back to the simple
organization that God ordained in scripture!
The Catholic position: Peter was designated by Christ be the
"universal bishop" and God intended for the Bishops of Rome to be the chair
of his power in succession. This of course, is contrary to the Bible and
all recorded history. Such a view is as purely mythical as the Muslim view
that Jesus was a Muslim and Abraham sacrificed Ishmael instead of Isaac.
The Greek Orthodox position: Orthodox believers object to Rome's
claim of universal authority because it is contrary to the recorded history
of the Ecumenical councils. The very first council at Nicea (325 AD)
granted equal power to initially three Metropolatans: Rome, Alexandria and
Antioch. Two later councils, Constantinople (381 AD) and Chalcedon (451
AD), granted equal powers to five Patriarchs: Rome Constantinople, and
Alexandria, Jerusalem, Antioch. Orthodox believers, while acknowledging
that their "patriarchal system" is not found in scripture, believe that
divine providence brought it into existence. They object to the Roman
Catholic monarchy because it would mean one of two things: 1. That God
repudiated the decisions of the Ecumenical councils and changed his mind in
favour of monarchal power at Rome. Such is difficult for the Orthodox mind
to accept, for they see the decisions of the Ecumenical councils as being
inspired and directed by the Holy Spirit. Therefore it is like changing the
Bible itself. 2. That there was a three stage evolution of church
government first, with the simple Biblical arrangement of autonomous local
churches, then the trends towards centralization at produced the
Patriarchal system of the 4th and 5th centuries and finally the Papal
monarchy. Orthodox believers want the "god directed evolution" to stop in
the 5th century. Of course the Orthodox position of flawed in its very
foundation, by rejecting the Biblical pattern as God's final purpose for
the church for all time.
The Protestant position: Amazingly, most Protestants agree with
Catholics and Orthodox believers that the Ecumenical councils were
ultimately ordained of God. The difference lies in where the organizational
evolution stopped. The Orthodox says it stopped in the 5th century with the
Patriarchal system, the Catholic in the 6th century with Papal monarchy,
and the Protestant stops the evolution during the reformation and
thereafter, depending on the specific denomination. Of course some
Protestants, familiar with history has been drawn away from Protestantism
and towards either Orthodox or Roman Catholic, depending on which set of
arguments he accepts as most valid. If he feels the record of history, as
revealed in the Ecumenical councils is most important, the Protestant will
be drawn towards Orthodox. If the Protestant is most impressed with the
claims that the bishop of Rome is the God ordained successor of Peter, and
their interpretation of Mt 16:18 that the church was built upon Peter
himself, he will naturally defect to Catholicism. The Protestant position,
therefore is one rife with contradictions and illogicalities.
B. Philip Schaff comments:
"Here lies the difference, however, between the Greek and the
Protestant opposition to the universal monarchy of the papacy. The Greek
church protested against it from the basis of the oligarchical patriarchal
hierarchy of the fifth century; in an age, therefore, and upon a principle
of church organization, which preceded the grand agency of the papacy in
the history of the world. The evangelical church protests against it on the
basis of a freer conception of Christianity, seeing in the papacy an
institution, which indeed formed the legitimate development of the
patriarchal system, and was necessary for the training of the Romanic and
Germanic Nations of the middle ages, but which has virtually fulfilled its
mission and outlived itself. The Greek church never had a papacy; the
evangelical historically implies one. The papacy stands between the age of
the patriarchal hierarchy and the age of the Reformation, like the Mosaic
theocracy between the patriarchal period and the advent of Christianity.
Protestantism rejects at once the papal monarchy and the patriarchal
oligarchy, and thus can justify the former as well as the latter for a
certain time and a certain stage in the progress of the Christian world."
(Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, book 3, ch 5)
"The apostolical organization of the first century now gives place
to the old Catholic episcopal system [one bishop heading each church]; and
this, in its turn, passes into the metropolitan [one diocesan bishop over
many churches], and after the fourth century into the patriarchal [one
bishop over many other diocesan bishops]. Here the Greek church stopped,
and is governed to this day by a hierarchical oligarchy of patriarchs equal
in rank and jurisdiction; while the Latin church went a step further, and
produced in the middle ages the papal monarchy." (Philip Schaff, History of
the Christian Church, book 2, chapter 4)
Click to View Find a local congregation of the New Testament church that
is organized exactly as the Bible says!
Compiled and edited by Steve Rudd
Click Your Choice
Back to START
|