The Effect of Religious Faith on our Nation's Founding
Some good news! And its even about our government! In fact, its even about our
government and religion! A friend of mine sent me some information about a web
site developed by the Library of Congress. It is devoted to an examination of
the effect of religious faith on the founding of our nation.
The following is the index and the opening paragraph of introduction to the
site:
EXHIBITION SECTIONS
I. America as a Religious Refuge: The Seventeenth Century
II. Religion in Eighteenth-Century America
III. Religion and the American Revolution
IV. Religion and the Congress of the Confederation, 1774-89
V. Religion and the State Governments
VI. Religion and the Federal Government
VII. Religion and the New Republic
INTRODUCTION
"This exhibition demonstrates that many of the colonies that in 1776 became the
United States of America were settled by men and women of deep religious
convictions who in the seventeenth century crossed the Atlantic Ocean to
practice their faith freely. That the religious intensity of the original
settlers would diminish to some extent over time was perhaps to be expected, but
new waves of eighteenth century immigrants brought their own religious fervor
across the Atlantic and the nation's first major religious revival in the middle
of the eighteenth century injected new vigor into American religion. The result
was that a religious people rose in rebellion against Great Britain in 1776, and
that most American statesmen, when they began to form new governments at the
state and national levels, shared the convictions of most of their constituents
that religion was, to quote Alexis de Tocqueville's observation, indispensable
to the maintenance of republican institutions. The efforts of the Founders of
the American nation to define the role of religious faith in public life and the
degree to which it could be supported by public officials that was not
inconsistent with the revolutionary imperatives of the equality and freedom of
all citizens is the central question which this exhibition explores."
Now, consider this:
Several years ago, there was an atheist that took the town of Zion, Illinois to
court over the use of a cross on their city seal. Zion is a community north of
where I live that was founded by Catholic missionaries. He said the seal was
unconstitutional. He won his court case and the city was forced to remove the
cross form the seal. Is it not ironic that two of the most influential men
responsible for the constitution had the following disagreement concerning the
seal of the United States, as is recorded at the above Library of Congress site:
Proposed Seal for the United States
"On July 4, 1776, Congress appointed Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and
John Adams "to bring in a device for a seal for the United States of America."
Franklin's proposal adapted the biblical story of the parting of the Red Sea
(left). Jefferson first recommended the "Children of Israel in the Wilderness,
led by a Cloud by Day, and a Pillar of Fire by night. . . ." He then embraced
Franklin's proposal and rewrote it. Jefferson's revision of Franklin's proposal
was presented by the committee to Congress on August 20. Although not accepted
these drafts reveal the religious temper of the Revolutionary period. Franklin
and Jefferson were among the most theologically liberal of the Founders, yet
they used biblical imagery for this important task."
Evidently the men who wrote and framed the constitution did not think religious
symbols on government seals was unconstitutional. Their disagreement was not
over whether to use a religious figure but rather which one to use! Why on earth
would a judge today who is supposed to be familiar with our constitution think
such is a violation?
I would like to share one more paragraph from the site with you because I concur
with its sentiment. The reason for my concurrence is because the Bible teaches
that "righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people".
"The first national government of the United States, was convinced that the
'public prosperity' of a society depended on the vitality of its religion.
Nothing less than a 'spirit of universal reformation among all ranks and degrees
of our citizens,' Congress declared to the American people, would 'make us a
holy, that so we may be a happy people.'"
Amen! (That's my "Amen!" - and thank you, government of the United States, for a
very factual, informative and attractive site - J.Q.)
By Jon Quinn
The Front Page
From Expository Files 5.8; August 1998