What is the original Bible name of the church???
God never named the church!
Did God Name the Church?
Did you know our moon has no name? Have you ever asked yourself "why did we name every planet in our solar system but not the moon?" We even named all the moons of Saturn, but we didn't name our own. Why? Because you never need to name something of which there is only. Now, let's suppose you asked someone what the name of the moon is. What would they say? Obviously, they would say "moon." Yet, that does not mean that the name of the moon is really “moon.” If you say to a small child, while pointing to his father, "who is that man over there?" He would reply, “my daddy.” Now, it is obvious that "dadda" and "moon" are in the same category. There are many daddy's and moons but they are distinct in themselves. So the words "daddy" and "moon" are NOT names at all. Look in your back yard at the trees. What do you call each of them? Tree? Spruce? Spruce Tree? If you had 10 spruce trees on your property, you might refer to a specific one as "that spruce" (pointing to it), but unless each spruce has a distinct name, nobody else would understand which tree you are referring to if you say "that Spruce". A man could be described as a father, a man, a citizen, a husband, factory worker, BUT HE HAS ONLY ONE NAME. The trees in my back yard are described as "spruce", "green", "tall", or "living," but NONE OF THEM ARE NAMES. Same is true with the church. In the Bible, God describes His people in 40 + different ways, but none of them are a name.
The Bible specifically speaks of the word "Christian" as being a name. "If anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not feel ashamed, but in that name let him glorify God" (1 Peter 4:16). We might get upset when we hear the word "Christian" used as an adjective. ("He has a good christian attitude" or "that is a good christian school.) Why then don't we get upset when we hear someone turn a verb into a name. For example, Christians are individually described as "sheep", "disciple", "stone", "member", "soldier," etc. So, although God describes His people individually as "sheep, disciple, stone," these are not names. Yet the Bible tells us the word "Christian" is a name.
The church is described in many ways with "metaphors". Each metaphor gives us a different view point of the church. These are descriptors.
Care needs to be taken to differentiate the local church from the universal church.
The local church can be either a single congregation or a collection of local churches in an area. The local church excludes other living Christians and all those who are dead. The Universal church is every Christian, both living and dead. For example, Rom. 16:16 is discussing a collection of one set of local churches greeting the church at Rome. The universal church is not mentioned here. The term "Christians" is not a metaphor for the "collective." But rather is a unit of the collective, like "soldiers" are of "army." Same with "disciples" and "servants." "Now you are Christ's BODY (collective term), and individually MEMBERS (unit of the collective) of it" (1 Cor. 12:27). As "kingdom" collects "citizens" and "flock" collects "sheep," "church" collects people (the word doesn't say if they are Christians or not: Acts 7:37; 19:32,39), and a "church of CHRIST" is a collective of people who profess to be CHRISTIANS who have banded together to work and worship together. Example: "to the CHURCH OF GOD which is at Corinth, THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN SANCTIFIED in Christ Jesus, SAINTS..." (1 Cor. 1:2).
Likewise, Acts 20:28, Acts 11:26 and 1 Tim. 3:15 all refer to the local church not the universal. One should not conclude the elders are to oversee "the church" in the universal sense in which it is used in 1 Cor. 12.
Metaphors for the church |
|||||
Verses |
Collective |
Individual |
Jesus |
God |
Meaning |
1 Ti 3:15 |
Household |
Children Brothers |
Firstborn Eldest Son |
Father |
Family: Love And Care |
Col 1:13 |
Kingdom |
Citizens |
King/Judge |
King |
Authority: Privileges Obligations |
1 Pe 2:9 |
Priesthood |
Priests |
High Priest |
God |
Service |
Eph 2:19-22 |
Temple Building |
Stones |
Foundation |
Architect |
1.God's Presence |
1 Cor 12:12-27 |
Body |
Members |
Head |
- |
Support & Dependency |
Rom 16:16 |
The Church |
Saints Aliens The Redeemed |
Saviour Purchaser Redeemer |
- |
1. Christ's Possession 2.Holiness |
Acts 11:26 |
Christians |
Christian |
Christ |
- |
Christ's Possession & Household |
Luke 14:27 |
Disciples |
Disciple |
Teacher |
- |
Student Of Jesus |
Luke 17:7-10 |
Servants |
Servant |
Lord |
- |
Selfless Obedience |
1 Pe 5:2-4 |
Flock |
Sheep |
Shepherd |
- |
Protection Of Caring For By Jesus |
2 Ti 2:3-4 |
Army |
Soldier |
Commander |
- |
Fight Spiritual Battles For Jesus |
Eph 5:22-32 |
Wife |
- |
Husband |
- |
Intimate Spiritual Relationship |
Are "Elder (Presbyter), Pastor (Shepherd) and Bishop (Overseer)" all names? Should our elders go around calling themselves, "Pastor Smith, "Elder Smith," or "Bishop Smith"? We all understand that these are not names, but descriptions of their function or qualification: The word "elder" implies an older man of age; the word "shepherd" implies one who loves and cares; and the word "overseer" implies authority and control. If "church of Christ" is a name, then "pastor" is a name. The truth is, neither “pastor”, “Church of Christ” nor "disciples” are names. They are descriptions.
Why did God not name the church? AGAIN, WE DO NOT NEED TO NAME ANYTHING OF WHICH THERE IS ONE. There is only one church. If there were two, EACH WOULD REQUIRE A DISTINCT NAME SO AS TO DISTINGUISH ONE FROM THE OTHER. Some maintain that "CHURCH OF CHRIST" is a name for the church. If God did name the church, then it is a church with many names (about 40 if you count them), ranging from "church of God" to "little flock". It would not be unscriptural, for example, to put a sign on the building that reads "sheep meet here", but it would not be very helpful either. Herein lies the question. Are individual congregations at liberty to designate their meeting houses within the boundaries of scriptural propriety? The Body is the church and there is only one. This is why God never named the ONE church. Names are only needed when you have two of the same thing. In the first century, there were not hundreds of different denominations, each with their own doctrine, but one unified church.
Total global uniformity of name worldwide, is an indicator of denominationalism and violates the Bible pattern.
Has it ever occurred to us, that if we chose to universally use the terms "Church of Christ" or "Church of God" on the all the signs of meeting houses worldwide, we would be VIOLATING THE PATTERN of scripture? In the first century, local churches were given a variety of "descriptors" (or "names", for those who must think that way). "The church of God in Corinth" (1 Cor. 1:2); "the churches of Galatia" (Gal 1:2), and "the saints in Christ Jesus that are at Philippi." If God wanted all the churches in the world to go by only one single designation, such as "CHURCH OF CHRIST," then He would have told us so. Not only that, but the Bible wouldn't include 40 or so other DIFFERENT designations ("church of God", "The Way", etc.). It may be that the few local churches that use different descriptors from the majority and put something like, "Christians meet here," "Assembly of Christ, " “Assembly of Saints,” or "The Way" on their signs, are keeping the collective of local churches from straying from the Bible pattern on a global basis. If all local churches only used the designation "Church of Christ," we could not claim to be the same church as the one described in the Bible. Obviously, if God had wanted His church to wear the name "Church of Christ," He would have told us to do it.
When people seeking the truth are looking for the church we can read about in the Bible, they should look for a church where sister congregations use at least some variation on a global basis. We make this same argument when we speak of the "government of the church". God did not want the church to have a single worldwide government, as is standard practice among most denominations. Instead, He determined for each local church to be autonomous, just as each golf course is autonomous, being separately owned and operated, but each following the same PGA rule book that is used as the standard.
Conclusion:
We need to reconsider the practice of exclusively putting "Church of Christ" on signs as a name or even a description of who we are. There is only one church and God never named it. Conversely, we should not criticize others that may use the term "church of God" or "church of the first-born" or "assembly of God" or "assembly of Christ" or "Christians meet here" (no designation at all, but simply marking a meeting place of Christians) or "the church". We need also remember that global uniformity of "the name on the sign" is proof that some kind of central world government for the church exists. Such global uniformity almost always indicates denominationalism. The Bible pattern of variation in local churches is a trademark of the first century church. May we always conform to the Bible pattern, and not by a practice that has become habit by churches of the Lord's people, much less criticize local churches that practice variation in the "descriptor on the sign".
I. Anti-Biblical names used by Denominations that violate the Bible pattern:
Notice that neither the name on the sign or the name each member wears, is not found in the Bible. On an individual basis were are also described in about 40 different ways, but we are given only one name to wear: "Christian" (1 Peter 4:16).
II. How the church is described in the Bible blueprint:
A. God never named the church, but it is described many different ways in the Bible:
B. Geographic descriptors of the church in the Bible like these were the most common:
III. Early uninspired Christians used great variation in referring to the church in keeping with the Bible blueprint. They echoed the Bible pattern!
They did not pick a single denominational name not found in the Bible, but referred to each church most commonly by geographic location using a Bible designation. This mirrors the practice of the apostles in the Bible:
A. Clement was an elder in the church at Rome who was writing a letter to church in Corinth because they had ousted the eldership. He wrote about 96 AD:
B. Ignatius wrote his epistles about 250 AD to several churches and addresses them in this fashion:
C. Polycarp wrote about mid 2nd century AD
D. A letter from the church in Smyrna about the martyrdom of Polycarp about 155 AD.
|
IV. Speaking words fitting of sound doctrine and not the "language of Ashdod"!
"But as for you, speak the things which are fitting for sound doctrine." (Titus 2:1) |
"As for their children, half spoke in the language of Ashdod, and none of them was able to speak the language of Judah, but the language of his own people." (Nehemiah 13:24) |
|
I. "Only God is Reverend"! Don't call me awesome, only God is awesome! Really? Not!
"Holy and reverend [Strongs 3372] is God's name.” (Psalm 111:9)
A. Definition of the word "Awesome/reverend" [Strongs 3372]
B. Definition of the word "Awesome/reverend" [Strongs 3372]
C. All Parents, Moses and Joshua were REVEREND:
D. DON'T CALL ME AWESOME… ONLY GOD IS AWESOME!!!
II. "Attend Your church? You don't have a church, its Christ's alone! " Really? Not!
"Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body." (1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
Discussion:
III. "Where do you GO TO CHURCH?" It is unscriptural to say GO TO CHURCH! Really? Not!
Discussion:
IV. "church of Christ" or Church of Christ"?" It is unscriptural to captize the C in church! Really? Not!
Discussion:
1. Some say it is unscriptural to capitalize the "c" in "church" of Christ. Really? NOT!!!
2. We know the term "church of Christ" is not a name but a descriptor like "car of Steve" (ie the car belonging to Steve).
3. To be sure Romans 16:16 does NOT capitalize the word church: "All the churches of Christ greet you".
4. Also, my word processor gives me a red wavy line under the word "christian" when I deliberately spell it with a little "c"? But "church of Christ" or "church of God" DO NOT have the little red spell check wavy line under it indicating it is spelled wrong.
5. We also know historically the Greek text was originally all lower case, then all upper case and that the "fashion trend" of capitalizing proper nouns developed hundreds of years later again.
6. Having said all this, we live in the modern world and the even though CHURCH is NOT a proper noun, there are still some times when we MUST capitalize the phrase Church of Christ… like in advertising where we list our addressed in flyers. If we do not capitalize the C, it breaks our modern RULES of grammar AND rules of advertising.
7. When we do not capitalize the c in church of Christ, everyone flags it as a typo in their mind.
8. So we thing we were being clever in "teaching the ignorant masses" that the Church of Christ is a descriptor and not a name by not capitalizing the C in church of Christ when in fact they NEVER comprehend this but walk away concluding we are a bunch of ungrammatical hicks.
Conclusion:
9. Some of the issues where we are correct need a bit of re-thinking on how we approach the general public. Take the "do not capitalize the C in Church of Christ issue. It is kind of like how I do not correct the countless number of people who refer to me as "Pastor Steve" in the middle of a discussion about today's weather as we passed on the street. In my younger, foolish days, I would say, "Now hold on there bucko, I am not a Pastor. There are three Greek words in the New Testament Pastor, Bishop, Elder… I AM NOT A PASTOR… What I am is based upon three other Greek words: Minister, Evangelist, Preacher (notice I capitalized them because in their eyes it is a title), so the scriptural thing to call me is a minister or an evangelist or a preacher." Remember all this was during a discussion about the weather and they think I am crazy because they don't even go to church! So they walk away and say, "Ok Goodbye Minister Steve". Again I start up, "Look Minister is not a title or a proper noun… Don't call me Minister Steve, for minister is a job description not a title…. AND NEVER CAPITALIZE the word minister I the future if you do want to call me that next time we pass on the street and talk about the weather." We need to choose our battles better… and the time and place to fight them.
By Steve Rudd