Bible Prophecy
Fulfilled: Matthew 2:23 “He shall be called a Nazarene”
He Shall be called a Nazarene" Mt 2:23
"Jesus, the despised
Holy branch messiah"
|
Midrashic
style
|
Prophetic connection
|
Comment
|
Phonic wordplay: similar sounding in Hebrew
|
"Branch" Isa 11:1
|
The Greek word for
"Nazarene" [Naṣrat] sounds like the Hebrew word for
"Branch" [nēṣer]. The "branch of David" meant
"Son of David" and was the foremost messianic attribute. Not only
was Jesus universally called, "Jesus the Nazarene" the crowds often
addressed him as "Son of David have mercy on me". Mark 10:48 The word play made “Jesus the branch who lived in branch
land”.
|
Phonic wordplay: similar sounding in Greek
|
"Nazarite"
Name of Messiah branch is
HOLY Isa 4:1-3
|
LXX substitutes "Holy
one of God" for Nazarite in Judg 13:7 and 16:7. Jesus was universally
known as the "Holy one of God". As they searched the scriptures,
they noticed Isa 4 prophesied the name of the messiah was "HOLY". See also Isaiah 43:3; Luke 4:34; John 6:69
|
Allusion: Town of Nazareth had a bad reputation. Jn 1:46
|
Nazareth "Despised,
forsaken, worm" Isaiah 53:3; Psalm 22:6
|
Just as a good
man from the inner city of Detroit or Flint Michigan, Las Vegas or anywhere
in Califorinication and would be stigmatized in a negative stereotype, so too
was Jesus for being from the town of Nazareth. Even Nathaniel, the
"Israelite in whom is no guile" commented, "can any good thing
come from Nazareth". The holy one of God was born in insignificant
Bethlehem and grew up in despised Nazareth.
|
Midrashic messianic
prophecy fulfilled "Jesus the Nazarene": Mt 2:23
|
“Behold, a man whose name is
Branch [Hebrew: tsemach], for He will branch out from where He is; and
He will build the temple of the Lord. “Yes, it
is He who will build the temple of the Lord, and He who will bear the honor
and sit and rule on His throne. Thus, He will be a
priest on His throne, and the counsel of peace will be between the two
offices.” (Zechariah 6:12-13)
|
Introduction:
- It is clear that Matthew, the professional tax collector,
was fluent in Hebrew. For example, when Matthew records, "Jesus came and lived in a city called Nazareth. This was
to fulfill what was spoken through the prophets: “He shall be called a
Nazarene.” (Matthew 2:23)
- Atheists, Jews and "Bible trashers" say Matthew
got it wrong because no Old Testament prophecy says anything about Jesus
being "called a Nazarene".
- In fact, when Matthew wrote, "as the prophets
prophesied" in Mt 2:23, he was following a Midrashic method and
style of connecting many different texts and prophecies in exactly the
same way as the Jewish rabbis of his day.
- The Jews in Matthew's day would instantly recognize his
method of connecting scriptures the way he did in Mt 2:23.
- Mirroring the first century Jewish Midrashic style
Matthew makes three prophetic connections that the messiah would be
called a "Nazarene".
- While today we may scratch our heads at first, everyone in
the first century knew exactly which Old Testament passages to which
Matthew was referring.
- Non-Christian Jews today who say "Matthew got it
wrong" are being very "un-Jewish" since the interpretation
methods of the first century rabbis were identical to Matthew's
throughout his entire gospel.
- The fact that Matthew does not give specific details of
the origin of the prophecy proves that it was common knowledge that had
already been widely preached.
A. JESUS THE BRANCH: The phonic wordplay between
"Nazarene" [Greek: Naṣrat] and "branch" [Hebrew:
nēṣer] Isa 11:1
- "Aramaic Hebrew"
was a consonantal text that had no vowels. When you remove the modern
vowels from the words for Nazarene and Branch (netser
= nsr) the Hebrew consonants of Naṣrat (Nazareth) and nēṣer
are phonetically similar. Bible scoffers go so far as to say Matthew, like
the rest of the population obviously had no working knowledge of Hebrew.
In fact the opposite is true. Matthew knew the scriptures in Hebrew and
could make the phonic connection between Nazarene and branch. Since
Matthew wrote in Greek, this argument was directed at the Jerusalem elite
who had already made the connection as soon as the general population
began announcing the messiah to be Jesus the Nazarene (branch).
- The first century expectation of the Messiah was fueled
by a whole series of Bible passages that connect him linguistically with
the "branch and root of David" using the word:
"tsemach" Isa. 4:2; 53:2; Jer 23:5; 33:15; Zech 3:8; 6:12. But
the central and most significant of these "messiah = branch"
prophecies was Isaiah 11:1: "Then a shoot will spring from the stem
of Jesse, and a branch [netser] from
his roots will bear fruit. The Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him"
(Isaiah 11:1)
- It was Matthew's intimate knowledge of Hebrew that
allowed him to construct a phonic play on words between the sound of the
Greek word for Nazareth (Nazaret), Nazarene (Nazōraios)
and the sound of the Hebrew word for Branch (netser) in Isa 11.
The non-Hebrew speaking Christians would initially be at a loss, like we
are today, to make the connection. They would have asked the Hebrew
speaking "elite Jerusalem" priests if they knew any place in
the Old Testament that said the messiah would be called a Nazarene. Only
they would catch the obvious play on words found in the most important
messianic text Isa chapters 7-11.
- The incredible power of this messianic prophecy is that
in 730 BC when Isaiah was living, Mosaic
Hebrew was the language of the
general Hebrew public but at the time of its fulfillment, Aramaic and
Greek were the native languages and Hebrew was functionally extinct among
the masses. In other words, the Holy Spirit was able to construct the
prophecies so that the fulfillment required a then non-existent Greek
named city called "Nazareth". When the masses, who did not
speak Hebrew, began to announce that the Messiah was Jesus the Nazarene,
they unknowingly irked the Hebrew speaking "Temple Elites" who
would hear, "Messiah, Jesus the Branch". No wonder they said,
“But this crowd which does not know the Law is accursed.” (John 7:49)
- The etymological origin of the name Nazareth is unknown,
but archeological excavation indicate it was an agricultural town with
vineyards.
- "Vineland" is a town in Ontario Canada named
after its vineyards.
- "Recent excavations there by Stephen Pfann and
others have revealed the presence of building activity, viticulture—that
is, growing and processing grapes and producing wine—and terrace
farming" (NT307 Archaeology and the New Testament, Craig Evans,
Nazareth, 2014 AD)
- To illustrate, if you say to a blonde
Swedish girl you want to "kiss her" she might slap you
because in Swedish "kiss" sounds like "pee". If you order "salsa" in a Korean restaurant,
the waiter might chuckle because in Korean "salsa" sounds like
"diarrhea". In the same way, the crowds unknowingly went around
saying the "Messiah was Jesus the Branch" (Nazarene) which would
annoy the Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees who spoke Hebrew and heard the
crossover connection between the Greek town of Nazareth and the Hebrew
word for Branch almost immediately. The later Christians, of course, all
knew about this phonic word play which Matthew records as a matter of
historical fact.
- Messianic texts:
- Twice in Matthew's nativity narrative he draws from the
foremost messianic text of Isa 4-11 and applies it to Jesus:
i.
Virgin + God with us: Isa 7:14 + 8:10.
ii.
Nazarene = Branch: Isa 4:2; 11:1.
- "Then a shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse,
and a branch [Hebrew: nēṣer] from
his roots will bear fruit. The Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him, The
spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and strength,
The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord." (Isaiah 11:1-2)
- “Behold, a man whose name is
Branch [Hebrew: tsemach], for He will branch out from where He is;
and He will build the temple of the Lord. “Yes, it is He who will build
the temple of the Lord, and He who will bear the honor and sit and rule
on His throne. Thus, He will be a priest on His throne, and the counsel
of peace will be between the two offices.” (Zechariah 6:12-13)
- At the time Matthew wrote his gospel, the idea that Jesus
fulfilled the prophecies that the "messiah would be a Nazarene" was
universally understood and widely preached.
- The Messiah's name was "the branch" Isa 11:1;
Zech 6:12.
- So widely was Jesus known as "the branch from
branchland", that 13 times in the New Testament Jesus is called
"the Nazarene". Jesus' "name" was "the Nazarene"
which to the Jewish leaders sounded like "Jesus the Branch"
through a play on words in two languages: Greek and Hebrew. "What I
consider most probable is that Mattityahu is combining the second and
third alternatives by means of wordplay, a technique
very common in Jewish writing, including the Bible. Yeshua is both netzer and Natzrati."
(Jewish New Testament Commentary, D. H. Stern, Mt 2:23, 1996 AD)
- At his arrest, twice they said they were looking for
"Jesus the Nazarene" and twice Jesus said, "I am He".
- The sign above Jesus' cross read, "Jesus The Branch
[Nazarene], The King Of The Jews.”
- The tri-lingual sign was written in Aramaic
for the common people because only Elite Jerusalem temple priests spoke
Hebrew. The sign was in the Aramaic (Jews), Latin (Romans/legislative)
and Greek (World/commerce) inscription Pilate put on Jesus' Cross. (John
19:20)
i. "John notes
that the notice is trilingual, in Aramaic (the spoken
language of Jewish Palestine), in Latin (the official language of the
Roman Empire), and Greek (the common language of trade and literature)."
(The College Press NIV Commentary, John 19:20, 1989 AD)
ii. "The
reading was aided also by the fact that the inscription was trilingual. Anyone
in the crowd who could read could almost certainly read Aramaic or Latin or Greek. Thus Pilate’s description of Jesus would
become widely known through the city and beyond. Moreover, each of the
languages has a significance of its own. Aramaic was
the language of the country, Latin the official language, and Greek the
common language of communication throughout the Roman world." (NICNT
commentary, John 19:19, Leon Morris, 1995 AD)
iii. "The inscription was read by many Jews because the site of
the crucifixion (in those days) was close to the city. The inscription is in
three languages (not a hint in the Synoptics of this): Aramaic,
Latin, Greek." (Hermeneia, Jn 19:20, 1984 AD)
iv. "That is,
it would have been written in Aramaic (a related language to Hebrew), the
common language of the people; in Latin, the official language of the Roman
government; in Greek, the trade/international language of the eastern
Mediterranean world." (New Testament Background Commentary, Harold Mare,
Jn 19:20, 2004 AD)
v. "Since the
sign was written in three languages—Aramaic,
Latin, and Greek—and the Crucifixion was in a public place, all who could read
saw a clear proclamation." (Bible Knowledge Commentary, Jn 19:20, 1985 AD)
vi. Since
the inscription was written in three languages yet the recorded inscription
differs in each of the four gospels, the question arises if John was directly
quoting from either the Aramaic, Latin or Greek inscription. Perhaps all three
inscriptions were identical, but simply recorded differently by each
evangelist. The word Nazarene sounds equally like the Hebrew word for
"branch" in either Aramaic, Latin, "Nazarenvs" or
Greek, "Nazoraios". Just as in today, all three languages would
create a word in their own languages that sounded like Nazarene, the same way
all non-English speaking foreigners call citizens of the USA
"Americans" the same way the native Americans pronounce it.
- Pilate designed the sign to irritate
the Jewish leaders as much as possible which is why he DID NOT
write the inscription in Hebrew.
i. Hebrew
was the professional academic language of the Temple that the officiating
Sadducees, scribes and Pharisees used, the very group who tried and crucified
Jesus.
ii. The
inscription therefore, was a direct communication from Pilate to the general
population that Jesus was an innocent man. This would remind the crowds that it
was initially the Hebrew speaking "temple professionals" who in fact
incited the general population to crucify Jesus at the very reluctant hands of
the Romans.
iii. Pilate clearly designed the inscription to snub
and annoy the temple academics by the wording that emphasized the
difference of the two verdicts where the three Jewish trials judged Jesus
guilty but the three Roman trials judged Jesus innocent and proclaiming Jesus was their king. This is one thing Pilate got
right and the Jews God wrong.
iv. "As for the
notice itself, its implication that the Jews are a people whose miserable
“king” hangs on a cross, offends them, and is made all the worse by being
publicly accessible as well to Gentiles passing by who read only Greek or
Latin. Pilate is rubbing salt in old wounds, the
wounds that were opened when he repeatedly called Jesus “the King of the Jews”
(see 18:33, 39; 19:3, 5), and finally presented him as “your king” (see vv. 14,
15)." (NICNT commentary, Jn 19:20, J. Michaels, 2010 AD)
- On the day of Pentecost, Peter preached the
very first sermon and his opening statement was to say that JESUS THE
BRANCH and 3000 repented and were baptized for the remission of their
sins:
i. "“Men of
Israel, listen to these words: JESUS THE NAZARENE
[BRANCH], a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and
signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves
know— this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of
God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death.
“But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it
was impossible for Him to be held in its power." (Acts 2:22–24)
ii. “Therefore
let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord
and Christ—this Jesus whom you crucified.” Now
when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart,
and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brethren, what shall we do?” Peter said to them, “Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus
Christ for the forgiveness of your sins." (Acts 2:36-38)
- Apostle Paul who was part of the "Jerusalem
Elite" was fluent in Hebrew being trained by famous teacher of the
Law "Gamaliel". The "converting
words" spoken by Jesus directly to him were, "I am
Jesus the Branch [Nazarene], whom you are persecuting." (Acts 22:8)
Paul was certainly very familiar with the connection between the messianic
"branch" prophecy of Isa 11 and Jesus the messiah being
universally called, "the branch" (the Nazarene). Paul
immediately converted to Christianity and was baptized for the remission
of his sins three days later. (Acts 22:16)
B. JESUS THE HOLY ONE OF GOD: phonic wordplay between
Nazarene and Nazarite (LXX) and Jesus "the holy one of God" = Isa
4:1-3
- Nazarite Vow in the Law of Moses: Num
6:1-21
a.
"Speak to the sons of Israel and say to
them, ‘When a man or woman makes a special vow,
the vow of a Nazirite, to dedicate himself to the Lord, he shall abstain from wine and
strong drink; he shall drink no vinegar,
whether made from wine or strong drink, nor shall he drink any grape juice nor eat fresh or
dried grapes. ‘All the days of his separation he shall not eat anything
that is produced by the grape vine, from the seeds even
to the skin. ‘All the days of his vow of separation no razor shall pass over his head. He shall be holy
until the days are fulfilled for which he separated himself to the Lord; he shall let the locks of hair on
his head grow long. ‘All the days of his separation to the Lord he shall not
go near to a dead person. ‘He shall not make himself unclean for his
father or for his mother, for his brother or for his sister, when they die,
because his separation to God is on his head. ‘All the
days of his separation he is holy to the Lord." (Numbers 6:2-8)
- It is impossible for a Christian to keep
the Nazarite vow since the Aaronic priesthood is extinct.
- It is amusing to meet Christians today
who think they are keeping the Nazarite vow. The attraction to be
spiritually superior as a “long-haired hippie” outweighed the negative
aspect of abstinence, given they usually love to drink beer. Most of
these already had long hair and their only battle was not getting caught
drinking beer or partaking the Lord’s Supper in church.
- The phonic similarity between Nazarene and Nazarite would
cause early Christians to explore messianic passages that predicted Jesus
would be a Nazarite who would "vow" not shave his hair or drink
wine like Samson.
- "the designation “Nazarene” might have been intended
to spark an association with “Nazirite” (ναζιραῖος,
naziraios; Judg 13:5, 7; 16:17; 1 Macc 3:49 LXX). Because the two terms had similar pronunciations, this
theory requires no jump from Greek to Hebrew. Furthermore,
pre-Gospel tradition already might have exploited the terms’ phonological
similarity as well as the semantic equivalence in the LXX between
“Nazirite of God” (ναζιραῖος
θεοῦ, naziraios theou) and “holy one
of God” (ἅγιος θεοῦ,
hagios theou; see Mark 1:24; Luke 4:34; perhaps John 6:69). Luke’s
infancy narrative shares significant parallels with that of Samuel the
Nazirite in 1 Sam 2" (Lexham Bible dictionary, Nazareth, 2016 AD)
- The Septuagint (LXX) was the standard text used in every
synagogue inside and outside Israel in the first century because nobody
could speak Hebrew any more except the Jerusalem temple elites (scribes,
priests, Sadducees, Pharisees). Aramaic and Greek were the working
languages inside Israel and exclusively Greek outside Israel.
- Although they would quickly conclude no such prophecy
exists, they would surely notice in their Septuagint, fact that Samson,
the Nazarite was called "the holy one of
God" in both Judges 13:7 and 16:7.
- Even more profound, was the fact that two hundred years
earlier, the translators of the Septuagint chose to substitute
"Samson shall be a Nazirite to
God" (Masoretic) with "Samson shall be called the holy one of God" (LXX).
- So powerful is this argument, that some non-Christian
Jewish apologists say Judges and Isaiah were not translated into Greek
until after 200 AD by Christians who corrupted the text. This idea it
easily proven false. It was Jews in 200 BC who translated it that way
long before the Christian era. This "substitution" was in every
synagogue on earth in the first century, since the LXX was the standard
text they used.
- "To begin with, there is
in the LXX an interchange between ναζαραῖος
θεοῦ and ἅγιος
θεοῦ and (see
A and B for Judg 13:7; 16:17). This is significant because Jesus was
known as ‘the holy one of God’ (Mk 1:24; Lk 4:34; Jn 6:69; cf. Acts 3:14;
1 Jn 2:20; Rev 3:7). Moreover, in Mk 1:24 we find this: ‘What have you to
do with us, Jesus of Nazareth (Ναζαρηνέ)? Have you come to destroy us? We know who you are,
the holy one of God’ (ὁ
ἅγιος τοῦ θεοῦ). Here ‘Jesus of Nazareth’ and ‘holy one of God’ are
in parallel and we clearly have a word play: Jesus, the ‘holy one of God’
(= nāzîr), is from Nazareth." (Critical and
Exegetical Commentary, Davies, Allison, Matthew 2:23, 2004 AD)
- Jesus was widely known as "the Holy one of God".
- The very first reports about Jesus that spread through
the population were about a cast out demon who called Jesus "the
Holy one of God".The demon called Jesus "Holy one of God"
inside the crowded Capernaum synagogue: “Let us alone! What business do
we have with each other, Jesus of Nazareth? Have You come to destroy us?
I know who You are—the Holy One of God!” … And the
report about Him was spreading into every locality in the surrounding
district." (Mark 1:24; Luke 4:34,37)
- Peter's short confession included on fact: "We have
believed and have come to know that You are the
Holy One of God.” (John 6:69)
- Peter's first and second sermons that resulted in over
5000 Jews converting to Christianity contained direct references to Jesus
being the Holy One of God: "You will not allow Your Holy One
to undergo decay. (Jesus rose the third day)" Acts 2:27. "But
you disowned the Holy and Righteous One and
asked for a murderer to be granted to you," (Acts 3:14)
- "And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia
write: He who is holy, who is true, who has the key of David, who opens
and no one will shut, and who shuts and no one opens, says this:"
(Revelation 3:7)
- The Christians then connected the allusion that Jesus
would be holy like a Nazarite in a metaphoric sense:
- The name of the "messiah branch" is HOLY:
"For seven women will take hold of one man in
that day, saying, “We will eat our own bread and wear our own clothes,
only let us be called by your name; take
away our reproach!” In that day the Branch of
the Lord will be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the earth will
be the pride and the adornment of the survivors of Israel. It will come
about that he who is left in Zion and remains in Jerusalem will be called holy—everyone who is recorded for
life in Jerusalem." (Isaiah 4:1-3)
- Samson the most famous Nazarite was directly called THE
HOLY ONE OF GOD in the standard synagogue Bibles at the time Christ began
his ministry.
- Jesus was already reported to be THE HOLY ONE OF GOD.
- Therefore the Messianic prophecy that the Messiah would
be CALLED holy was metaphorically fulfilled through the similarity of the
words Nazarene and Nazarite through the translation of the Septuagint in
200 BC.
- This kind of connection may seem strange to Christians
today, but to the Jerusalem elite priests and experts in the Law of Moses
and the prophets, this was very, very typical in Jewish Midrashic style.
C. JESUS THE DESPISED: Jesus was associated with a
town of bad reputation: "Nazareth"
- Towns you don’t want to say you are from
today if you are a Christian:
|
Sin city: Las Vegas
Immoral/crazy city: San Francisco
Slum city: Detroit or Flint Michigan
Death city: Chicago
|
- "Can any good thing come from Nazareth"
- Even Nathaniel, the "Israelite in whom is no
guile" commented, "can any good thing come from Nazareth"
(Jn 1:46).
- People are often stereotyped based upon where they grew
up.
- Jesus grew up in Nazareth which had a bad reputation like
Detroit or Flint Michigan have today
- This exactly matches the lowly and despised
"ambiance" of the Messiah.
- "He was despised and forsaken of men …. we did not
esteem Him." (Isaiah 53:3)
- "But I am a worm and not a man, a reproach of men
and despised by the people." (Psalm 22:6)
- The messiah was not going to be from a place of high
esteem, like Jerusalem, but of low esteem, even despised.
- The holy one of God was born in insignificant Bethlehem
and grew up in despised Nazareth.
D. Conclusion:
1.
Matthew’s statement in Mt 2:23: "and came and lived in a city
called Nazareth. This was to fulfill what was spoken through the prophets: “He
shall be called a Nazarene.” (Matthew 2:23)
a.
Nowhere is this statement found in scripture and it has
been attacked by Bible skeptics as proof Matthew was not inspired.
b.
Matthew was in fact drawing upon three scriptural
concepts and applying them to Jesus.
c.
Atheists, Jews and "Bible trashers" say
Matthew got it wrong because Old Testament prophecy says nothing about Jesus
being "called a Nazarene".
2.
Mirroring the first century Jewish Midrashic style
Matthew makes three prophetic connections that the messiah would be called a
"Nazarene".
a.
First: “Jesus the branch (Isa 11:1) who lived in
branch land (Nazareth)”.
b.
Second: Jesus was holy (LXX replaced Nazarite with holy in Judges 13:7;
16:7).
c.
Third: “Jesus was despised (Isa 53:3; Ps 22:6) because he came from
Nazareth which had a bad reputation. (Jn 1:46)”
3.
When Matthew wrote, "as the prophets
prophesied" in Mt 2:23, he was following a standard and accepted Midrashic
method and style of connecting many different texts and prophecies in exactly
the same way as all the Jewish rabbis of his day. They would instantly
recognize his method of connecting scriptures the way he did in Mt 2:23 and
would accept what he wrote as powerful, authentic and inspired.
4.
While today we may scratch our heads at first, everyone
in the first century knew exactly which Old Testament passages to which Matthew
was referring. Jews today who say "Matthew got it wrong" are being
very "un-Jewish" since the interpretation methods of the first
century rabbis were identical to Matthew's throughout his entire gospel.
6.
The key is to understand that everyone was already
calling “Jesus the Nazarene”. It is the most common way he was referred to in
the first century. Even the pagan Roman soldier asked Jesus at his arrest, “Are
you Jesus the Nazarene?”. The fact that Matthew does not explain how the
prophecy was connected with Jesus being called a “Nazarene” proves that it was
common knowledge which had already been widely preached.
7.
Matthew’s application was in fact stunningly brilliant
once you understand what he was doing. Matthew made the application of these
messianic prophecies like a master scholar.
8.
This is typical Midrashic style and is useful as a guide in decoding the
Olivet Discourse.
By Steve Rudd 2020: Contact
the author for comments, input or corrections.
Go To Start: WWW.BIBLE.CA